DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Josh Jacobs vs Ray DavisWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

DraftCall Analytics

Start Josh Jacobs over Ray Davis in 2026.

Josh Jacobs averaged 14.6 PPG in 2025 to Ray Davis's 7.8, a 6.8 point per game edge. Both play running backs, so that per-game gap is the cleanest tiebreaker for a 2026 start or sit.

The Bottom Line

The gap here is significant. Josh Jacobs outscored Ray Davis by 6.8 PPG in 2025 with 14 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Josh Jacobs is the clear pick. Ray Davis profiles as a matchup-dependent running back who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

In the app

Track Josh Jacobs and Ray Davis live in the DraftCall app.

RBGreen Bay Packers#8PPG LEADER
Josh Jacobs
PPG
14.6
Games
15
Rush Yds
929
Rush TDs
13
Rec
36
Rec Yds
282
Bye
Week 11
RBBuffalo Bills#99
Ray Davis
PPG
7.8
Games
15
Rush Yds
425
Rush TDs
3
Rec
22
Rec Yds
168
Bye
Week 12

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Josh Jacobs
Ray Davis

Head to Head

14.6 PPG7.8 PPG
15 GP15 GP
Bye: Week 11Bye: Week 12

Fantasy Tiers

Josh Jacobs: Tier 3 (Strong Starter) RB (ranked #8 at the position). Ray Davis: Unranked RB. Among the top 50 running backs this season, Josh Jacobs is producing at 66% of elite pace and Ray Davis at 35%. That ranking gap means Josh Jacobs carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Josh Jacobs vs Ray Davis: The Full Breakdown

The numbers tell a clear story here. Josh Jacobs put up 14.6 fantasy points per game for the Green Bay Packers in 2025, while Ray Davis managed 7.8 across 15 games with the Buffalo Bills. A 6.8-point weekly edge is substantial at the running back position.

That 6.8-point weekly advantage for Josh Jacobs is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Josh Jacobs ran for 929 yards and 13 touchdowns; Ray Davis posted 425 and 3. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Bye weeks matter for roster construction: Josh Jacobs sits Week 11 while Ray Davis is off Week 12. If you are deciding between the two as a season-long roster hold, the staggered byes actually work in your favor.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Josh Jacobs is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Ray Davis is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Josh Jacobs (age 28, 6 years) is past the typical RB peak. Redraft value exceeds dynasty value. Ray Davis (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

  • Josh Jacobs outscored Ray Davis by a projected 116 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Josh Jacobs scored 14 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.9 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
  • Josh Jacobs caught 36 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Josh Jacobs vs Ray Davis: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatJosh JacobsRay Davis
PPG (Half-PPR)14.67.8
Games Played1515
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)219117
Rushing Yards929425
Rush Yds/Game61.928.3
Rushing TDs133
Receptions3622
Receiving Yards282168
Targets440
Total TDs144
Age28-
Experience6 yrs-
Bye WeekWeek 11Week 12

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Josh Jacobs at 14.6 PPG, 6.8 points per game above Ray Davis's 7.8. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Josh Jacobs vs Ray Davis

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

Free on the App Store and Google Play. $2.99/month premium.

Inside the app

  • DraftCall opening screen. Plain-English fantasy help, from your first draft to game day.
  • Compare screen. Pick any two players and DraftCall calls it in seconds, with PPR, half, standard, and TE premium scoring toggles.
  • Verdict screen. Start Joe Burrow over Lamar Jackson at 68.2 percent confidence, with key factors, boom and bust ranges, and a stat-by-stat tale of the tape.
  • Feed screen. Injuries, big games, and status changes filtered to your own players first.
  • My Team screen. Starters with points per game, plus bye week and start-sit views of the whole lineup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Josh Jacobs or Ray Davis in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Josh Jacobs has the edge at 14.6 PPG compared to Ray Davis's 7.8 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Josh Jacobs and Ray Davis average in 2025?

Josh Jacobs averaged 14.6 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Ray Davis averaged 7.8 PPG over 15 games. That is a difference of 6.8 points per game.

When are Josh Jacobs and Ray Davis's bye weeks in 2026?

Josh Jacobs (GB) has a bye in Week 11, and Ray Davis (BUF) has a bye in Week 12. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Josh Jacobs or Ray Davis a better fantasy running back in 2026?

Josh Jacobs outscored Ray Davis by 6.8 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.