DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated from live stats

Dylan Sampson vs Ty ChandlerWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

Ty Chandler is the better fantasy start for 2026, averaging 5.9 PPG to Dylan Sampson's 4.7 in 2025. Full head to head breakdown below.

The Bottom Line

Ty Chandler is the better fantasy play this season.

Statistically, Ty Chandler and Dylan Sampson are interchangeable on a season-long basis. The 1.2-PPG gap is one broken play per game. For weekly start/sit calls, check opponent defense and recent form before defaulting to the name.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

Track Dylan Sampson and Ty Chandler in the DraftCall app and get their updates the moment they change.

Get the App
RBCleveland Browns#99
Dylan Sampson
PPG
4.7
Games
15
Rush Yds
175
Rec
33
Rec Yds
271
Bye
Week 10
RBMinnesota Vikings#99PPG LEADER
Ty Chandler
PPG
5.9
Games
14
Rush Yds
265
Rush TDs
2
Rec
18
Rec Yds
135
Bye
Week 6

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Dylan Sampson
Ty Chandler

Head to Head

4.7 PPG5.9 PPG
15 GP14 GP
Bye: Week 10Bye: Week 6

Fantasy Tiers

Dylan Sampson: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Ty Chandler: Tier 5 (Deep League) RB (ranked #99 at the position). Among the top 50 running backs this season, Dylan Sampson is producing at 21% of elite pace and Ty Chandler at 27%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

Dylan Sampson vs Ty Chandler: The Full Breakdown

The gap between Dylan Sampson and Ty Chandler is smaller than most fantasy managers think. Separated by just 1.2 PPG in 2025, this is one of those running back decisions that comes down to context, not name recognition. Dylan Sampson averaged 4.7 PPG with the Cleveland Browns across 15 games, and Ty Chandler posted 5.9 with the Minnesota Vikings in 14.

When two running backs are separated by less than two points per game, the decision shifts to weekly context. Who has the softer defense? Who is trending up over the last month? Which team is projected for more total points? Those are the tiebreakers that actually matter.

Both profile as early-down workhorses. Dylan Sampson ran for 175 yards and undefined touchdowns; Ty Chandler posted 265 and 2. Goal-line share, red zone touches, and which team is favored are usually the tiebreaker when neither back offers passing-game volume.

Dylan Sampson has his bye in Week 10, and Ty Chandler rests in Week 6. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at running back for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: Dylan Sampson (age 21) has not yet hit the RB cliff. High dynasty ceiling if volume holds. Ty Chandler (age 27) is approaching the age where RB production historically drops. Sell-high window is open.

Did You Know?

  • Ty Chandler outscored Dylan Sampson by a projected 20 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Dylan Sampson played 15 games in 2025 compared to Ty Chandler's 14. That durability gap means Dylan Sampson contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Ty Chandler scored 3 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at running back.
  • Dylan Sampson caught 33 passes in 2025. Pass-catching backs average 2-3 more PPG in half-PPR than their non-receiving counterparts.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

Dylan Sampson vs Ty Chandler: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
StatDylan SampsonTy Chandler
PPG (Half-PPR)4.75.9
Games Played1514
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)7183
Rushing Yards175265
Rush Yds/Game11.718.9
Rushing TDs02
Receptions3318
Receiving Yards271135
Targets400
Total TDs23
Age21-
Experience1 yrs-
Bye WeekWeek 10Week 6

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Ty Chandler at 5.9 PPG, 1.2 points per game above Dylan Sampson's 4.7. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Dylan Sampson vs Ty Chandler

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Launch List

Get the live verdict on Dylan Sampson vs Ty Chandler

The DraftCall app delivers live game-day verdicts on every matchup. Join the launch list and we will email you the day it goes live for the 2026 NFL season, with your direct iOS and Android install links.

We will never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Dylan Sampson or Ty Chandler in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Ty Chandler has the edge at 5.9 PPG compared to Dylan Sampson's 4.7 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Dylan Sampson and Ty Chandler average in 2025?

Dylan Sampson averaged 4.7 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 15 games in 2025. Ty Chandler averaged 5.9 PPG over 14 games. That is a difference of 1.2 points per game.

When are Dylan Sampson and Ty Chandler's bye weeks in 2026?

Dylan Sampson (CLE) has a bye in Week 10, and Ty Chandler (MIN) has a bye in Week 6. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Dylan Sampson or Ty Chandler a better fantasy running back in 2026?

Ty Chandler outscored Dylan Sampson by 1.2 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.