Download DraftCall for Free

Head to Head

Updated August 16, 2026 from live stats

CeeDee Lamb vs Malik NabersWho should you start in 2026 fantasy football?

DraftCall Analytics

Start CeeDee Lamb over Malik Nabers in 2026.

CeeDee Lamb averaged 12.6 PPG in 2025 to Malik Nabers's 12.0, a 0.6 point per game edge. Lamb also stayed healthier, playing 13 games to 4, which steadies his weekly floor. Both land in Tier 3 at the position, so this is closer than the raw gap suggests.

The Bottom Line

This one is genuinely close. CeeDee Lamb edges Malik Nabers by 0.6 PPG, but both are in the same production tier. The decision comes down to weekly matchup, not season-long resume. If you are choosing between them in a draft, CeeDee Lamb goes slightly earlier based on volume, but do not reach for the difference.

Low confidence: the production gap is narrow enough that weekly context matters more than the season line.

Download the App

Track CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers live in the DraftCall app.

App Store Google Play

WRDallas Cowboys#11PPG LEADER

CeeDee Lamb

PPG

12.6

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

1,077

Rec TDs

Targets

117

Bye

Week 14

WRNew York Giants#14

Malik Nabers

PPG

12.0

Games

Rec

Rec Yds

271

Rec TDs

Targets

Bye

Week 8

The Edge Chart

CeeDee Lamb

Malik Nabers

Head to Head

12.6 PPG12.0 PPG

13 GP4 GP

Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

CeeDee Lamb: Tier 3 (Strong Starter) WR (ranked #11 at the position). Malik Nabers: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) WR (ranked #14 at the position). Among the top 50 wide receivers this season, CeeDee Lamb is producing at 57% of elite pace and Malik Nabers at 55%. These two are close enough in the rankings that weekly matchup should dictate your start.

CeeDee Lamb vs Malik Nabers: The Full Breakdown

This is a genuine coin flip on paper. CeeDee Lamb finished the 2025 season at 12.6 PPG over 13 games with the Dallas Cowboys, while Malik Nabers clocked in at 12.0 across 4 appearances for the New York Giants. A 0.6-point gap means any given week could go either way.

With a margin this thin, season averages are not the deciding factor. Weekly variables like opponent defense, game script, and injury status carry more weight than a fraction of a PPG. The right start in Week 6 might be the wrong start in Week 14.

Target volume is the story here. CeeDee Lamb saw 117 targets in 2025, while Malik Nabers drew 35. That workload gap usually translates into a higher weekly floor for CeeDee Lamb, even in weeks where Malik Nabers posts the bigger ceiling game. Consistency-minded managers lean toward target share; boom-bust managers chase the upside.

One scheduling note: CeeDee Lamb is off Week 14 and Malik Nabers Week 8. If these two are on your roster, you will need a fill-in wide receiver for both weeks. DraftCall flags bye conflicts so you can plan ahead rather than panic on waivers.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Both are in a similar trade value range. A straight swap would be fair in most leagues, with the tiebreaker going to whichever manager values schedule or bye week more. Dynasty outlook: CeeDee Lamb (age 27) is in the middle of his productive window. Stable dynasty value. Malik Nabers (age 23) has years of prime production ahead. Buy-and-hold dynasty asset.

Did You Know?

•CeeDee Lamb outscored Malik Nabers by a projected 10 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
•CeeDee Lamb played 13 games in 2025 compared to Malik Nabers's 4. That durability gap means CeeDee Lamb contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
•CeeDee Lamb scored 3 total touchdowns in 2025 (0.2 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at wide receiver.
•CeeDee Lamb saw 117 targets in 2025. Target volume is the single strongest predictor of weekly PPR production at the wide receiver position.
•Malik Nabers is 4 years younger than CeeDee Lamb (23 vs 27), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.

Detailed Stat Breakdown

CeeDee Lamb vs Malik Nabers: 2025 fantasy football stat comparison in the half-PPR scoring format.
Stat	CeeDee Lamb	Malik Nabers
PPG (Half-PPR)	12.6	12.0
Games Played	13	4
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)	164	48
Receptions	75	18
Rec/Game	5.8	4.5
Receiving Yards	1,077	271
Rec Yds/Game	82.8	67.8
Receiving TDs	3	2
Targets	117	35
Target Share/Game	9.0	8.8
Age	27	23
Experience	5 yrs	1 yrs
Bye Week	Week 14	Week 8

Summary

Based on 2025 production, CeeDee Lamb holds the PPG edge with serviceable output at 12.6 points per game. Malik Nabers averaged 12.0 PPG. Season averages are a starting point, not the final word. For a full AI analysis factoring matchup quality, recent form, injury impact, and game script, download DraftCall and get a verdict backed by real data.

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on CeeDee Lamb vs Malik Nabers

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

App Store Google Play What you get →

Free on the App Store and Google Play. $2.99/month premium.

Inside the app

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start CeeDee Lamb or Malik Nabers in fantasy football?▾

Based on 2025 season averages, CeeDee Lamb has the edge at 12.6 PPG compared to Malik Nabers's 12.0 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers average in 2025?▾

CeeDee Lamb averaged 12.6 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Malik Nabers averaged 12.0 PPG over 4 games. That is a difference of 0.6 points per game.

When are CeeDee Lamb and Malik Nabers's bye weeks in 2026?▾

CeeDee Lamb (DAL) has a bye in Week 14, and Malik Nabers (NYG) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is CeeDee Lamb or Malik Nabers a better fantasy wide receiver in 2026?▾

CeeDee Lamb outscored Malik Nabers by 0.6 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.